Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2
Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Coronally Positioned Flap With or Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft in the Treatment of Multiple Marginal Gingival Recession Defects
Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39
Follow Us      

LOGIN

   Official Journal of The Academy of Osseointegration

 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 33 , Issue 3
May/June 2013

Pages e88–e94


Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Coronally Positioned Flap With or Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft in the Treatment of Multiple Marginal Gingival Recession Defects


Vivek Thombre, BDS, MDS/Somnath B. Koudale, BDS, MDS/Manohar L. Bhongade, BSc, BDS, MDS


PMID: 23593633
DOI: 10.11607/prd.1371

Gingival recession remains an important problem in dental esthetics. Various surgical techniques have been proposed for treating multiple gingival recessions. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a coronally positioned flap (CPF) with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) in the treatment of multiple marginal tissue recession. Twenty patients with a mean age of 31.6 years presented with 43 buccal/labial multiple recession defects (Miller Class I/II). Ten patients each were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: group 1 (ADMA) or group 2 (CPF). The clinical parameters gingival recession (GR), probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and width of the keratinized gingiva (KG) were recorded before surgery and 6 month postsurgery. The mean baseline recession defect was 3.0 mm for group 1 and 2.8 mm for group 2. After 6 months, both treatments resulted in significant root coverage (P < .01), reaching an average of 2.7 mm (90%) in group 1 and 1.8 mm (66%) in group 2. The difference in recession reduction between treatments was statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments in PD and KG. CAL gain (3.0 mm) was significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (2.0 mm). The results of this study demonstrate that ADMA with a CPF is an effective procedure for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:e88–e94. doi: 10.11607/prd.1371)


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

PRD Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help